fast file site

Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn’t enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

Web app is supported. It’s rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only should be in a folder.

You need to share a URL and that means you can’t share music files or videos.

According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It’s even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It’s far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, let’s assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it’s often cut off at that point)

It has a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it’s about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you’re in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn’t smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it’s in that state, you will need to find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you focus on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.

Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn’t bother me.

There are the most apps that may be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It’s a bit of a problem that the app doesn’t connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There’s a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it’s not stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it’s the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you’re going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)

Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify until the start of playback. It’s the best in the world when it comes to media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.

The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn’t work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It’s practically infinite unless you’re going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards…

You will find a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn’t flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to talk about data conveniently with little use of the web page’s resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

p2p 추천 Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is very disadvantageous. It’s a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it’s disadvantageous above. It’s better to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

If you don’t install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it’s less than Google Drive).

It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive’s may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we’ve often used. And there’s also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn’t that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.